EVALUATION OF ECO LOCAL SUB-PROJECT AND ECO WORKSHOP:
The ECO project is evaluated by combining teacher assessment, co-evaluation and self-assessment.
The instruments used to evaluate the project are:
We specify below the type of evaluation and the instruments used for each activity and phase of the project.
1. PHASE OF PREPARATION: LOCAL SUB-PROJECT
During this phase students prepared themselves to being able to think critically, they started to use some Web 2.0 tools and launched their communication skills.
Students watched some films, related them with philosophy and history, created map minds, presentations and some posters. All these was evaluated by the teacher with this sheet:
2. PHASE OF EXECUTION: LOCAL SUB-PROJECT
Activity 1: Publication of news and reviews:
The teacher evaluates the quality of the news and reviews published by students using specific rubrics designed for this purpose (HEADING 1 AND 2).
The teacher will also use an Excel to keep track of the news and reviews published by each student throughout the project.
In this Excel we marked the quality of each news and review published by the students on a monthly basis, so that at the end of the project we could be able to evaluate the improvement of skills throughout the project, in particular, the skills that Follow-up will be as follows:
- Written communication (Writing in news and reviews),
- Relational ability (Relationship with curriculum in news and reviews),
- Technological literacy (Image and dissemination in networks in news and reviews),
- Critical thinking (critical thinking in reviews)
The students knew the rubrics from the first day and the teacher shared them with them.
When the teacher observed that the students were not clear about how to write the news and reviews or noted that the boys were not giving everything they could or that they could improve on their results, he or she met them and, rubric in hand, asked them to carry out a self-assessment exercise to raise awareness of the errors they were having and could correct them.
Activity 2: ECO Knowledge bank.
This activity was evaluated on the one hand by the classmates who were receiving the knowledge capsules and on the other hand by the teacher.
For this the following indicators were followed.
3. DISSEMINATION PHASE: LOCAL SUB-PROJECT + WORKSHOPS DURING MOBILITY
The Gymkana and the workshops were evaluated by the participants in the workshops and the Gymkana in accordance with this rubric.
All the Spanish students (10th Grade and 11Th grade) that took part on the activities coevaluated and heteroevaluated the work and Turkish students, following the English version of the rubric also evaluated the activity and their friends work.
The teachers evaluated the participation and work of the Spanish and Turkish students according to the following rubric:
4. EVALUATION PHASE: LOCAL SUB-PROJECT + WORKSHOPS DURING MOBILITY
Finally, at the end of the project, two self-evaluation of the students (Spanish and Erasmus + students) were carried out, in which they evaluated the different phases of the project as well as their perception of the improvement of each one of the skills that have been tried to promote during the months that the ECO project has lasted.
A. Spanish self-evaluation of ECO
B. Erasmus + students self-evaluation of ECO and Inside World
An online questionnaire designed with the Kwik surveys tool that was shared with the students was used.